Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
Please help us to help more homeless people by setting up a monthly direct debit.
the Pavement relies on donations and volunteering from individuals and companies...
MORE ON DONATING
RECENT TWEETS
Our ongoing investigation into the use, and geographical range, of Dispersal Zones
In the April issue of The Pavement ('In the zone'), we discovered that increasing numbers of rough sleepers were being given Asbos or dispersal notices for congregating in the piazza of Westminster Cathedral.
Although the police maintained that people could only be dispersed from the piazza if they were behaving 'anti-socially', local homeless groups said rough sleepers were being targeted because local authorities did not want them gathering in the area. "Police come up simply because they're congregating," said Rudi Richardson, from homeless charity Streetlytes. "If one person is drinking and four people aren't, the whole group gets moved on anyway," he said.
Police powers to disperse people in this way were laid out in the Anti-Social Behaviour Act of 2003, mainly to help tackle youth crime. If a group of two people or more gathered in a designated area, behaving in a way likely to cause "harassment, alarm or distress to members of the public", they could be dispersed and banned from returning under threat of criminal charges.
Despite the severity of these measures (the punishment for breaking a dispersal order can be imprisonment and a £2,500 fine), there seems to be some inconsistency and confusion about the way the law is applied. The Pavement spoke to an officer from the Metropolitan Police, who requested that we do not identify him, about the uncertainty surrounding the application of dispersal zones.
"There isn't a defined formula," he said. "It depends on the severity of the situation, the frequency and the impact on the local community." Zones are set up following consultation between police and the council, depending on the perceived level of threat, and could be quickly implemented, he said.
Zones can only remain in place for six months before being reviewed. Nevertheless, some areas of London have had dispersal zones in place for as many as six years, with their licenses being reinstated by the police and the council twice a year.
Local councils and police forces seem to be unsure of how long some dispersal zones are in place and where? For instance, at Westminster Cathedral Piazza, local police believe a zone has been in place there since last Christmas. Yet Westminster council said only two dispersal zones existed in the borough - one on Ebury Bridge and the other on Castle Lane.
Local authorities in London are keen to stress the purpose of dispersal zones is to stop intimidating and anti-social behaviour only, not to prevent rough sleepers from congregating on the street.
PC Marcus King, who runs a year-old dispersal zone in Kensington, told The Pavement: "If people are just congregating, it's not an issue. Dispersal zones are only to stop groups of aggressive beggars and people behaving anti-socially."
PC King added boundaries of the dispersal zone were clearly marked, with maps attached to lamp-posts detailing the conditions of the Anti-Social Behaviour Order.
However, the visibility of dispersal zones is disputed by Tamsin Fulton, a designer working in local government, who has spent a number of years researching the zones and their effects on the community.
"Even local businesses tended not to know about the dispersal zones," she said. "There are virtually no visual clues to the restriction in force." Ms Fulton added: "The crimes themselves are open to interpretation: anti-social behaviour is subjective, and it's that non-explicitness which is the problem, over just what kind of behaviour is unacceptable."
Ms Fulton is working with The Pavement to create an updated map of all of London's dispersal zones, which will be made available online for all of our readers. We hope to build up a picture of how many areas of the capital you can be dispersed from, and what effect this could have on rough sleepers in the city.
If you know of a dispersal zone in your area, you can help us update our map by emailing editor@thepavement.org.uk.
Although the police maintained that people could only be dispersed from the piazza if they were behaving 'anti-socially', local homeless groups said rough sleepers were being targeted because local authorities did not want them gathering in the area. "Police come up simply because they're congregating," said Rudi Richardson, from homeless charity Streetlytes. "If one person is drinking and four people aren't, the whole group gets moved on anyway," he said.
Police powers to disperse people in this way were laid out in the Anti-Social Behaviour Act of 2003, mainly to help tackle youth crime. If a group of two people or more gathered in a designated area, behaving in a way likely to cause "harassment, alarm or distress to members of the public", they could be dispersed and banned from returning under threat of criminal charges.
Despite the severity of these measures (the punishment for breaking a dispersal order can be imprisonment and a £2,500 fine), there seems to be some inconsistency and confusion about the way the law is applied. The Pavement spoke to an officer from the Metropolitan Police, who requested that we do not identify him, about the uncertainty surrounding the application of dispersal zones.
"There isn't a defined formula," he said. "It depends on the severity of the situation, the frequency and the impact on the local community." Zones are set up following consultation between police and the council, depending on the perceived level of threat, and could be quickly implemented, he said.
Zones can only remain in place for six months before being reviewed. Nevertheless, some areas of London have had dispersal zones in place for as many as six years, with their licenses being reinstated by the police and the council twice a year.
Local councils and police forces seem to be unsure of how long some dispersal zones are in place and where? For instance, at Westminster Cathedral Piazza, local police believe a zone has been in place there since last Christmas. Yet Westminster council said only two dispersal zones existed in the borough - one on Ebury Bridge and the other on Castle Lane.
Local authorities in London are keen to stress the purpose of dispersal zones is to stop intimidating and anti-social behaviour only, not to prevent rough sleepers from congregating on the street.
PC Marcus King, who runs a year-old dispersal zone in Kensington, told The Pavement: "If people are just congregating, it's not an issue. Dispersal zones are only to stop groups of aggressive beggars and people behaving anti-socially."
PC King added boundaries of the dispersal zone were clearly marked, with maps attached to lamp-posts detailing the conditions of the Anti-Social Behaviour Order.
However, the visibility of dispersal zones is disputed by Tamsin Fulton, a designer working in local government, who has spent a number of years researching the zones and their effects on the community.
"Even local businesses tended not to know about the dispersal zones," she said. "There are virtually no visual clues to the restriction in force." Ms Fulton added: "The crimes themselves are open to interpretation: anti-social behaviour is subjective, and it's that non-explicitness which is the problem, over just what kind of behaviour is unacceptable."
Ms Fulton is working with The Pavement to create an updated map of all of London's dispersal zones, which will be made available online for all of our readers. We hope to build up a picture of how many areas of the capital you can be dispersed from, and what effect this could have on rough sleepers in the city.
If you know of a dispersal zone in your area, you can help us update our map by emailing editor@thepavement.org.uk.
October – November 2024 : Change
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01