Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
Please help us to help more homeless people by setting up a monthly direct debit.
the Pavement relies on donations and volunteering from individuals and companies...
MORE ON DONATING
RECENT TWEETS
The new coalition government wants to repeal laws that infringe civil liberties, so here‘s an obvious choice
The new deputy prime minister Nick Clegg has said the new coalition government will consider repealing laws it sees as infringing civil liberties. Clearly, this is likely to be a long list, but perhaps one law under consideration, which affects many of our readers directly, should be the Vagrancy Act.
Passed in 1824, the Act makes it a criminal offence to sleep on the street and to beg.
Homeless organisations such as Shelter, Crisis and Homeless Link have long appealed for it to be scrapped, arguing that it penalises some of the most vulnerable people in society and effectively criminalises poverty.
Back in 2003, Crisis argued begging and rough sleeping "are primarily questions of social exclusion and are most effectively addressed by tackling their root causes". Shelter has also called for Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, which relate to begging and sleeping outdoors or in unused buildings respectively, to be removed. In a November 2007 report on government homelessness policy, Shelter said that there would be "no public support for wider use of criminal sanctions to address begging". In the same year, Homeless Link also appealed to the government to scrap the law. Its submission said: "Given that there is little public support for a punitive approach to rough sleeping and begging, that criminalising already vulnerable people is more likely to compound their problems and frustrate the work of support agencies, and that more creative welfare-based and employment solutions need to be found, we urge the government to repeal the Vagrancy Act 1824 entirely."
Soldiers Off The Street, which campaigns on behalf of homeless ex-servicemen, points out on its website that as late as 1990 there were 1,250 prosecutions in London alone. This showed that far from falling by the wayside, the Vagrancy Act was still being used to prosecute rough sleepers over 160 years after it was first brought in.
We have submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) Act request to the Metropolitan Police to find out how many people have been arrested under the Vagrancy Act in their area in the last year. We have also submitted a request to the Ministry of Justice to find out how many people have been convicted under the Act in the same period.
As well as our FOI requests, we have also been in touch with human rights groups such as Liberty, the British Institute of Human Rights and Housing Justice, to gauge interest in restarting a broad-based campaign for the abolition of the Act.
• We encourage readers who have been charged under the Vagrancy Act to contact us and tell us about their experiences. You can also read about the history of the Act.
The new deputy prime minister Nick Clegg has said the new coalition government will consider repealing laws it sees as infringing civil liberties. Clearly, this is likely to be a long list, but perhaps one law under consideration, which affects many of our readers directly, should be the Vagrancy Act.
Passed in 1824, the Act makes it a criminal offence to sleep on the street and to beg.
Homeless organisations such as Shelter, Crisis and Homeless Link have long appealed for it to be scrapped, arguing that it penalises some of the most vulnerable people in society and effectively criminalises poverty.
Back in 2003, Crisis argued begging and rough sleeping "are primarily questions of social exclusion and are most effectively addressed by tackling their root causes". Shelter has also called for Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, which relate to begging and sleeping outdoors or in unused buildings respectively, to be removed. In a November 2007 report on government homelessness policy, Shelter said that there would be "no public support for wider use of criminal sanctions to address begging". In the same year, Homeless Link also appealed to the government to scrap the law. Its submission said: "Given that there is little public support for a punitive approach to rough sleeping and begging, that criminalising already vulnerable people is more likely to compound their problems and frustrate the work of support agencies, and that more creative welfare-based and employment solutions need to be found, we urge the government to repeal the Vagrancy Act 1824 entirely."
Soldiers Off The Street, which campaigns on behalf of homeless ex-servicemen, points out on its website that as late as 1990 there were 1,250 prosecutions in London alone. This showed that far from falling by the wayside, the Vagrancy Act was still being used to prosecute rough sleepers over 160 years after it was first brought in.
We have submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) Act request to the Metropolitan Police to find out how many people have been arrested under the Vagrancy Act in their area in the last year. We have also submitted a request to the Ministry of Justice to find out how many people have been convicted under the Act in the same period.
As well as our FOI requests, we have also been in touch with human rights groups such as Liberty, the British Institute of Human Rights and Housing Justice, to gauge interest in restarting a broad-based campaign for the abolition of the Act.
• We encourage readers who have been charged under the Vagrancy Act to contact us and tell us about their experiences. You can also read about the history of the Act.
October – November 2024 : Change
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01