Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
RECENT TWEETS
Some see soup runs as a good thing. Others claim giving people handouts keeps them homeless, damaging their health and life chances. Emdad Rahman, journalist and soup kitchen volunteer, went out to find out what the fuss is all about.
The words “soup kitchen” bring to mind older times – a necessity in a pre-welfare state for those who fell through the gaps. The first soup kitchens date back to the late 18th century, so surely by now we’ve worked out how to keep everyone fed? But as many of you will know only too well, soup kitchens remain very relevant today.
As benefits are slashed, and people find themselves sanctioned, it’s not just food banks people are falling back on; a Scottish Government report found nearly five times as many people used both food banks and soup kitchens in the six months to September than during the whole of 2011–12. Meanwhile, most soup kitchens up and down the country are themselves are reporting record demand on their services.
Yet, believe or not, there is a lot of controversy surrounding soup kitchens in Britain. The majority of the wider public view soup runs as a godsend, a lifeline and support for some of the most vulnerable people in our society. It’s certainly a view I hold. When I began volunteering at the Whitechapel Mission one Christmas day morning, what I noticed immediately was that people from all walks of life were here. Some had lost employment, others were in debt, some suffering from stress – all factors that had led them to need the help of the soup kitchen. You may be one of the thousands who rely on them too.
But some see it differently. Many of the big charities believe that they are not helpful as they help entrench people in a homeless lifestyle. If you know you can get food on the street, you’re less likely to move on with your life, so the argument goes.
Meanwhile, for many authorities it’s mobile services that prove especially controversial, with critics claiming they attract people to city centre locations, bringing with them criminality and other problems.
No matter that research from Shelter showed this was not the case, some councils have longstanding concerns. In 2011, Westminster backed down – under pressure – on plans to ban soup runs entirely from the borough, but some soup run organisers claim they remain hostile.
Soup kitchens in many areas report that they are under attack. Earlier this year, the Christian Kitchen, which had been served notice by the council to move from its central location, won a judicial review which allows it to stay put for the time being.
Last month, Bournemouth Borough Council told Anastasia Wells at the Street Light soup kitchen which feeds up to 150 people a week, that foods could not be handed out as it could attract antisocial behaviour. The Council’s Community Safety manager, Andrew Williams, says: “We are working with Street Light to find an alternative and more appropriate location for the soup kitchen. We are particularly concerned for the safety of both residents and tourists who use the gardens who are currently impacted by its presence, especially those trying to access the toilet facilities and the potential for antisocial behaviour.”
Stratford City in East London seems well-heeled on the surface. But it does not seem so affluent once you realise that 50–80 people sleep rough at night. One Third is a local group of volunteers who run a soup kitchen. Group leader Kaiser Raja told The Pavement: “These are essential services for some of our most helpless and vulnerable fellow citizens.
“We run a small kitchen on Friday and Saturday evening every week. Judging by the number of visitors who are hungry and sleeping rough, we are very popular with the masses. We receive absolutely no government funding and the kitchen runs on the good will and big hearts of our volunteers and members of the public who donate their time and money.”
Kaiser has strong words for the sofa pundits who take potshots: “Excellent services like ours are amazing resources and I have just one thing to say to those who say we pander to poor work shy attitudes: come and spend one hour in the presence of our volunteers and service users and see if your attitude doesn’t change.”
Amanda (who didn’t want to give her surname) is a regular guest at the One Third soup kitchen: “I pop along every Saturday to meet the team and have a chat,” she says. “I am homeless and have a baby. My father helps out as much as he can. My partner had to move away from London as his grandmother is terminally ill. I don’t have much money to eat healthily and pay the bills.”
She is clear about what this particular soup kitchen provides: “One Third are heaven-sent. This soup kitchen provides me with a hot meal and great company. The volunteers are very friendly and I forget about all my troubles for a couple of hours when I’m with them. Thank God they’re around because if they weren’t, I wouldn’t expect the government to help me out.”
Having been involved in the homeless sector for over 10 years, Jamie Nalton, interim manager of the London Simon Community, has passionate views to share: “Soup kitchens are absolutely necessary. They are independent services and a whole lot more than just food.
“Soup kitchens are where you can be yourself, meet people and enjoy a few moments where you can forget about the harshness of life.”
So while homelessness, benefit sanctions and poverty remain issues in Britain, it looks like soup kitchens will be staying.
Do soup runs provide an important service? Tell us what you think.
Find out where you can get help: thepavement.org.uk/services.php
October – November 2024 : Change
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01