Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
RECENT TWEETS
It was a Saturday morning when Stephen Fairley went to the cash machine and found that though he should have been paid his fortnightly Jobseeker’s Allowance, he had no money in his account.
He felt panicked. What could have happened? For almost two years, he had been faithfully looked for work, completing almost obsessive job searches and applying for a minimum of 30 jobs each week. He knew people’s benefits were being sanctioned left, right and centre, but didn’t think it could happen to him.
On Monday, he found out that his worst nightmare had come true: his advisor had “sent his paperwork upstairs” to be considered for a sanction because although he had applied for the agreed number of jobs, there had been a further 30 jobs that he could have applied for on the government’s Universal Jobmatch website that week.
His benefits had been stopped for two weeks. He managed to apply for a crisis loan, but even that took a couple of days to go through. And after the two weeks, instead of the full amount (£144.80 for the fortnight), he was given a £84 hardship payment to get through the fortnight.
“The thing that really annoys me is that I was doing so many computer searches for jobs that I was actually told that I should also be doing other things to help me get work,” he says. “I was applying for everything from dishwasher to chef or even waiter. I’ve applied for literally hundreds of jobs. If my advisor had flagged those jobs for me to apply for, I would have.”
Of course, Stephen’s situation is far from unique.
Last year more than one million sanctions were imposed – over a fifth of all jobseekers receive a sanction at some point.
In a survey by Homeless Link, 90 per cent of homeless accommodation services said their clients had been sanctioned.
The effects can be devastating. Official DWP guidance shows decision makers should expect people who are sanctioned to go people go cold and hungry.
Unfortunately, in many cases, it goes much further. A recent freedom of information request by the Disability News Service found that the Department for Work and Pensions has carried out 60 peer reviews following the deaths of customers. In 49 of these cases, benefit claimants had been sanctioned.
James (not his real name), who has been sanctioned three times, knows all too well the psychological stress of being denied benefits. “The thing was that when I got the next sanction, I felt so angry and powerless, I just felt like stabbing people. But, of course, I would never do that. And what happens is that you just repress that and you internalise it and end up damaging yourself. You’ve no way of speaking about it.
“The weight started falling off in the weeks after that,” he explains. “You don’t want to eat because…you can’t get it out your head how much they were b*stards and how much you’re left alone in the world”.
As a new report, Time to Rethink Benefit Sanctions, published by a coalition of Christian charities at the end of last month, states that while the physical effects may be obvious to all, “the personal costs of shame, demoralisation and destruction of self-worth are much harder to measure.”
What most find so frustrating is sanctions don’t help get people jobs. A survey of Citizens Advice Bureau staff, including in the charity’s report on sanctions last July, found that two-thirds did not believe sanctions encouraged people to look more actively for work.
Citizens Advice Scotland policy officer Gael Scott said: “We see people whose health is deteriorating and who are visibly anxious and distressed. We have been consistently calling for a full review of the sanctions regime.”
It’s a call that’s been recognised at last by the House of Commons Work and Pensions committee which last month found an independent review on the use of welfare benefit sanctions to investigate whether they are being applied fairly was needed.
Meanwhile Stephen Fairley has appealed his sanction. He stands a good chance of having it over-turned: six in 10 are when challenged. But in many ways it’s too late. “I’m trying to rise above it, but it’s hard,” he says. Now when I go in and see my advisor, I find it hard to take her seriously. The trust is gone.”
Sanctioned? What now?
If you are sanctioned, you may be paid no benefit for four weeks and possibly longer, but you should be able to claim a hardship payment. You must show that you or your family will suffer hardship unless a payment is made and that you have no other sources of support.
Hardship payments
If you are from a “vulnerable group” (pregnant, with caring responsibilies, disability, under 18 or recently in care etc), you can apply for a hardship payment immediately. If successful, you will be paid next time your benefit is due.
If you are not in a vulnerable group, you must wait 15 days from when the sanction began before you can claim a hardship payment.
Meanwhile, you may be entitled to an emergency payment or, in Scotland, a crisis grant from the Scottish Welfare Office. Contact your local council or housing benefit office to apply.
Appealing your decision
It is always worth appealing – the success rate is high and if you win, you not only get your money back but you also reduce your vulnerability to future sanctions.
If you want to challenge a benefit decision, you must ask the DWP to look at the decision again before you can appeal. This is called mandatory reconsideration.
The deadline for lodging an appeal is one month from the date of the decision notice, so act quickly. Ask any Citizens Advice Bureau for help – they appeal sanctions every day. At an appeal hearing, you have the right to be represented and to have a Welfare Rights Officer with you.
More info
www.gov.uk/government/publications/appeals-process-changes-for-dwp-benefits-and-child-maintenance or phone: 0845 608 8545 (from landlines)
You can also see: www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/sscs
December 2024 – January 2025 : Solidarity
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 153 : December 2024 – January 2025 : Solidarity
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01