Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
Please help us to help more homeless people by setting up a monthly direct debit.
the Pavement relies on donations and volunteering from individuals and companies...
MORE ON DONATING
RECENT TWEETS
The former top cop believes that having somewhere to live is the first stage towards establishing more stable lives for homeless Londoners
As the pace of the mayoral campaign picks up, Londoners are increasingly becoming aware of the alternatives to congestion-charging Red Ken or the cultivated buffoonery of Boris. Brian Paddick may have once been better known as the top-ranking gay policeman who advocated a softer approach to cannabis, but his campaign as voters realise there is much more to him than that. Mr Paddick is clear there needs to be a change at the top, and not for one of David Cameron's compassionate Conservatives.
The Liberal Democrat candidate has plenty of experience of a London that his counterparts are unlikely to have seen. As deputy assistant commissioner in the Metropolitan police, he had responsibility for the management of territorial policing across all 32 London boroughs. He was a senior spokesperson during the terror attacks in July 2005, and also came into the spotlight for his public disagreement with Met police commissioner Sir Ian Blair over the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes later that year.
But as well as the major events of the last few years that have shaken the capital to its roots, Mr Paddick is familiar with the mundane stories of misery that take place in the city and is keen to end them. "I am passionate about narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor," he says. "This is one of the wealthiest cities in world, and to have people living on the street, to have 50 per cent of kids living below the poverty line, is an absolute disgrace, not only after eight years of Ken Livingstone, but after 10 years of a Labour government. The Liberal Democrats are the only party that is really serious about narrowing this gap. There is a gross inequality that keeps the poor poor and makes the rich richer - homelessness is just one part of that."
The question of housing has been given a lot of air time by all the candidates - perhaps, in part, as a response to the hangover from last year's sub-prime crisis, and the fact that mortgage defaults are going up. The Lib Dem have for some time championed the move towards creating more affordable housing, and their mayoral candidate is happy to take up that mantle. "What we are talking about is decent affordable rented accommodation that would be suitable for homeless people, people currently in social housing and young professionals alike," says Mr Paddick. "We need to get away from the ghettoisation of particular social groups in particular housing developments."
The solution, he says, is to create a parallel market that starts at a lower base. He cites housing association Local Space, which works with the London Borough of Newham and local property companies to help vulnerably-housed families get a foot on the ladder. "That is the kind of mechanism we need," says Mr Paddick.
He acknowledges that getting a roof over your head may not be the solution to all homelessness-related problems, but is confident more affordable homes would address a major component of London's homeless population. Once people are housed, he says, it becomes easier to break "chaotic behaviour" patterns and become "more stable". "Having somewhere to live is the first stage towards stabilising people, establishing people," he adds.
Mr Paddick relates back to his own experience, when he offered his sofa to a young man who had been thrown out of his shelter for sniffing glue. "This is not just because there is an election on, this goes back years," he says. "If I become mayor, I will be active about the things I feel are important - one of them, which comes from personal experience, is to give those who want to get their lives back onto an even keel the help they need to do that. There are some people who want to live anonymously, and that is a matter for them, but there are a significant proportion of people who do want to get out of the chaotic lifestyle they lead and into something more stable. We should give them that opportunity."
The many A8 and A2 workers who end up on the streets or in hostels is a prime example of this, he says. But the solution must come from the top. "The whole immigration muddle policy that this government has now got is made up of inconsistent policies," he argues. "Most people do not come here to live off UK benefits; the overwhelming number of people want to come here to work, pay taxes, and contribute to the wealth of the country. People are finding that they come here and the work they thought was here is not, but when that happens where is the support? Either they are EU citizens, and therefore have all the rights everyone else has, or you say the economy cannot support that, and put restrictions down."
With Mr Paddick's experience in the police force, the idea that some readers are stopped and searched excessively and for no apparent reason comes as no surprise, and although he is committed to increasing police stop and search, he recognises it must be used in a constructive way. "We have to educate the police to use stop and search appropriately," he says. "Homeless people are an easy target for two reasons: they are on the street a lot, and the police see them as less likely to complain. Officers want to be seen by their bosses as doing something, but this is not doing anybody any good at all. They are picking on people who are vulnerable when they could be using that time to stop real criminals."
This ties in with another of his core policies: to ensure people who are vulnerable because of categories they are in - ethnic minorities, for example - are treated more inclusively. Mr Paddick is confident that with the right political support, chief commissioner Sir Ian could make the necessary "culture change" that would see an end to harassment of minorities.
"Ken is saying the police can do no wrong, but what we need is a constructive, critical mayor, who says the police are unnecessarily and unreasonably picking on the vulnerable. Ian Blair is the man to sort this out, and I am going to support him, because I do believe we need change - unlike the current mayor, who thinks that everything is fine."
It is not just over the police that Mr Paddick thinks Mr Livingstone has let London and its residents down over the last eight years of his tenure. He is highly critical of the mayor's pledge to eradicate homelessness by 2012, both of the feasibility of it, and the reasons behind clearing the streets of rough sleepers. "People have a right to be sceptical about what his real motives are," says the Lib Dem candidate. "Is he really genuine about helping people, or is he playing politics with homelessness?" Mr Paddick also highlights the lack of awareness-raising Mr Livingstone has done since he came into power in 2000. "His powers as mayor may be limited, but where is he using his authority to raise the issues nationally?"
He adds: "As mayor, you have a big democratic mandate. If the mayor chooses to champion particular issues, then people will listen to him."
In particular, Mr Paddick questions Mr Livingstone's promise to make half of all new developments affordable housing. "Since he made that pledge, the number has gone down to 34 per cent. There is a development near me that has just been approved with 30 per cent affordable housing. He is not delivering, and does not appear to be putting any effort into ensuring that promise is going to be delivered."
Mr Paddick is equally scathing about Mr Johnson. "He shows very little concern for people who are socially disadvantaged, as you would expect from a Conservative," he says.
To meet his long list of improvements needed for London, Mr Paddick would like to see more powers given to the mayor, to remove what he sees as the political affecting decisions rather than considering what is best. The lack of a unified response by local authorities to, for example, street drinking, is something he would very much like to see changed. "The trouble with London is you have 33 democratically elected local authorities, and it is very difficult to get consistent approach," he says. "A lot of councils are either shared power or marginal seats - London is more political in that sense than a lot of other places - therefore you get a lot of political decisions rather than the right decisions. To give things to the mayor that affect the whole of London, like homelessness, rather than local authorities - the strategic issue of social injustice, social welfare, those sorts of issues would be better dealt with."
It is clear that Mr Paddick views himself as something slightly apart from the other candidates, as he frequently distinguishes between himself and "politicians" who are at the beck and call of their constituency, or are motivated by reasons other than the desire to see improvements in the city. But will this strategy win over the cynical voters? "A lot of people say I am naïve," he admits. "But at least at the moment I get the platform to talk about these issues, and the practical common sense solutions - even if I do not get the votes."
The Liberal Democrat candidate has plenty of experience of a London that his counterparts are unlikely to have seen. As deputy assistant commissioner in the Metropolitan police, he had responsibility for the management of territorial policing across all 32 London boroughs. He was a senior spokesperson during the terror attacks in July 2005, and also came into the spotlight for his public disagreement with Met police commissioner Sir Ian Blair over the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes later that year.
But as well as the major events of the last few years that have shaken the capital to its roots, Mr Paddick is familiar with the mundane stories of misery that take place in the city and is keen to end them. "I am passionate about narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor," he says. "This is one of the wealthiest cities in world, and to have people living on the street, to have 50 per cent of kids living below the poverty line, is an absolute disgrace, not only after eight years of Ken Livingstone, but after 10 years of a Labour government. The Liberal Democrats are the only party that is really serious about narrowing this gap. There is a gross inequality that keeps the poor poor and makes the rich richer - homelessness is just one part of that."
The question of housing has been given a lot of air time by all the candidates - perhaps, in part, as a response to the hangover from last year's sub-prime crisis, and the fact that mortgage defaults are going up. The Lib Dem have for some time championed the move towards creating more affordable housing, and their mayoral candidate is happy to take up that mantle. "What we are talking about is decent affordable rented accommodation that would be suitable for homeless people, people currently in social housing and young professionals alike," says Mr Paddick. "We need to get away from the ghettoisation of particular social groups in particular housing developments."
The solution, he says, is to create a parallel market that starts at a lower base. He cites housing association Local Space, which works with the London Borough of Newham and local property companies to help vulnerably-housed families get a foot on the ladder. "That is the kind of mechanism we need," says Mr Paddick.
He acknowledges that getting a roof over your head may not be the solution to all homelessness-related problems, but is confident more affordable homes would address a major component of London's homeless population. Once people are housed, he says, it becomes easier to break "chaotic behaviour" patterns and become "more stable". "Having somewhere to live is the first stage towards stabilising people, establishing people," he adds.
Mr Paddick relates back to his own experience, when he offered his sofa to a young man who had been thrown out of his shelter for sniffing glue. "This is not just because there is an election on, this goes back years," he says. "If I become mayor, I will be active about the things I feel are important - one of them, which comes from personal experience, is to give those who want to get their lives back onto an even keel the help they need to do that. There are some people who want to live anonymously, and that is a matter for them, but there are a significant proportion of people who do want to get out of the chaotic lifestyle they lead and into something more stable. We should give them that opportunity."
The many A8 and A2 workers who end up on the streets or in hostels is a prime example of this, he says. But the solution must come from the top. "The whole immigration muddle policy that this government has now got is made up of inconsistent policies," he argues. "Most people do not come here to live off UK benefits; the overwhelming number of people want to come here to work, pay taxes, and contribute to the wealth of the country. People are finding that they come here and the work they thought was here is not, but when that happens where is the support? Either they are EU citizens, and therefore have all the rights everyone else has, or you say the economy cannot support that, and put restrictions down."
With Mr Paddick's experience in the police force, the idea that some readers are stopped and searched excessively and for no apparent reason comes as no surprise, and although he is committed to increasing police stop and search, he recognises it must be used in a constructive way. "We have to educate the police to use stop and search appropriately," he says. "Homeless people are an easy target for two reasons: they are on the street a lot, and the police see them as less likely to complain. Officers want to be seen by their bosses as doing something, but this is not doing anybody any good at all. They are picking on people who are vulnerable when they could be using that time to stop real criminals."
This ties in with another of his core policies: to ensure people who are vulnerable because of categories they are in - ethnic minorities, for example - are treated more inclusively. Mr Paddick is confident that with the right political support, chief commissioner Sir Ian could make the necessary "culture change" that would see an end to harassment of minorities.
"Ken is saying the police can do no wrong, but what we need is a constructive, critical mayor, who says the police are unnecessarily and unreasonably picking on the vulnerable. Ian Blair is the man to sort this out, and I am going to support him, because I do believe we need change - unlike the current mayor, who thinks that everything is fine."
It is not just over the police that Mr Paddick thinks Mr Livingstone has let London and its residents down over the last eight years of his tenure. He is highly critical of the mayor's pledge to eradicate homelessness by 2012, both of the feasibility of it, and the reasons behind clearing the streets of rough sleepers. "People have a right to be sceptical about what his real motives are," says the Lib Dem candidate. "Is he really genuine about helping people, or is he playing politics with homelessness?" Mr Paddick also highlights the lack of awareness-raising Mr Livingstone has done since he came into power in 2000. "His powers as mayor may be limited, but where is he using his authority to raise the issues nationally?"
He adds: "As mayor, you have a big democratic mandate. If the mayor chooses to champion particular issues, then people will listen to him."
In particular, Mr Paddick questions Mr Livingstone's promise to make half of all new developments affordable housing. "Since he made that pledge, the number has gone down to 34 per cent. There is a development near me that has just been approved with 30 per cent affordable housing. He is not delivering, and does not appear to be putting any effort into ensuring that promise is going to be delivered."
Mr Paddick is equally scathing about Mr Johnson. "He shows very little concern for people who are socially disadvantaged, as you would expect from a Conservative," he says.
To meet his long list of improvements needed for London, Mr Paddick would like to see more powers given to the mayor, to remove what he sees as the political affecting decisions rather than considering what is best. The lack of a unified response by local authorities to, for example, street drinking, is something he would very much like to see changed. "The trouble with London is you have 33 democratically elected local authorities, and it is very difficult to get consistent approach," he says. "A lot of councils are either shared power or marginal seats - London is more political in that sense than a lot of other places - therefore you get a lot of political decisions rather than the right decisions. To give things to the mayor that affect the whole of London, like homelessness, rather than local authorities - the strategic issue of social injustice, social welfare, those sorts of issues would be better dealt with."
It is clear that Mr Paddick views himself as something slightly apart from the other candidates, as he frequently distinguishes between himself and "politicians" who are at the beck and call of their constituency, or are motivated by reasons other than the desire to see improvements in the city. But will this strategy win over the cynical voters? "A lot of people say I am naïve," he admits. "But at least at the moment I get the platform to talk about these issues, and the practical common sense solutions - even if I do not get the votes."
October – November 2024 : Change
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01