Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
Please help us to help more homeless people by setting up a monthly direct debit.
the Pavement relies on donations and volunteering from individuals and companies...
MORE ON DONATING
RECENT TWEETS
There is a huge gulf between churches such as St Marylebone and others like Hinde Street Methodist Church which see outreach as part of their mission
The move-on of rough sleepers from the steps of Marylebone Church is only a single example of a squeeze on our readers that is affecting the whole of London.
As revealed in last month's issue, a number of rough sleepers were moved on from the Parish Church of St Marylebone, apparently following complaints about a minority of drinkers. But, far from being a localised incident, the move-on is now revealed as part of Westminster's new shift towards Building-Based provision for homeless people, and an attempt to dislodge rough sleepers regardless of the end result.
One of those affected, Steve, said that the move-on, while accomplished with the help of outreach workers, resulted in him being forced into another borough. He told The Pavement: "There had been months of talk about 'You're going to be moved on' with the final notice given in December, to move in January. Steve, who does not sign on and does not want to go into a hostel, found himself with no alternative but to move to the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, where he has since been threatened with an Asbo by a joint Outreach/Police team. "They had been saying it [the suggestion of an Asbo] for a while, but this was the first time it was said as a direct threat."
The Marylebone move-on highlights the deficiencies within Westminster's new strategy of clearing the streets of rough sleepers and failing to provide alternative options for those who don't want hostel accommodation – a policy that few wish to claim as their own. "At the time of the move on," Steve said, "the church was maintaining that it was as a result of pressure from the council that we were being asked to move on, while the council was claiming that it was the church that requested the move."
Mike Nicholas, communications officer at Thames Reach Bondway (TRB), said: "Marylebone Parish Church [had] expressed concern at the level of rough sleeping in the area and by some of the behaviour in the grounds of the church," and that, contrary to what we had reported, "the primary reason for the joint initiative was not instigated by a small group of street drinkers but by the numbers of people sleeping rough in the grounds of the church".
As mooted in the pages of this paper, the danger is if Westminster acts, others follow, as one London council official told this paper: "Westminster tends to be a trendsetter." Similarly, those who traditionally offer support to homeless people – often churches – find themselves under pressure to conform. The gulf between the attitude of The Parish Church of St Marylebone and that of Hinde Street Methodist Church, a quarter of a mile away, is a good example of this.
Hinde Street, the base of West London Mission, which works closely with the church, has resisted attempts to move on the rough sleepers, who have some drinkers among their number, who sleep around the church. Paul Thompson, Director of Social Work at West London Mission, told The Pavement: "The police are now making active moves to clear our steps, and move people on, which is something we are not happy with, as we are keen to stand alongside homeless people and work positively with them." Thompson pointed out that although they are not a haven for street drinkers, and do not wish to encourage such behaviour, the ministers of the church, such as Father Leao Neto, see part of their job as providing a sanctuary. We received no response from Marylebone Church, despite many emails and telephone calls.
Are you under orders to move from a regular sleeping spot? Let us know at The Pavement so that move-ons such as Surrey Street (the Strand) and Marylebone don't go unreported.
As revealed in last month's issue, a number of rough sleepers were moved on from the Parish Church of St Marylebone, apparently following complaints about a minority of drinkers. But, far from being a localised incident, the move-on is now revealed as part of Westminster's new shift towards Building-Based provision for homeless people, and an attempt to dislodge rough sleepers regardless of the end result.
One of those affected, Steve, said that the move-on, while accomplished with the help of outreach workers, resulted in him being forced into another borough. He told The Pavement: "There had been months of talk about 'You're going to be moved on' with the final notice given in December, to move in January. Steve, who does not sign on and does not want to go into a hostel, found himself with no alternative but to move to the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, where he has since been threatened with an Asbo by a joint Outreach/Police team. "They had been saying it [the suggestion of an Asbo] for a while, but this was the first time it was said as a direct threat."
The Marylebone move-on highlights the deficiencies within Westminster's new strategy of clearing the streets of rough sleepers and failing to provide alternative options for those who don't want hostel accommodation – a policy that few wish to claim as their own. "At the time of the move on," Steve said, "the church was maintaining that it was as a result of pressure from the council that we were being asked to move on, while the council was claiming that it was the church that requested the move."
Mike Nicholas, communications officer at Thames Reach Bondway (TRB), said: "Marylebone Parish Church [had] expressed concern at the level of rough sleeping in the area and by some of the behaviour in the grounds of the church," and that, contrary to what we had reported, "the primary reason for the joint initiative was not instigated by a small group of street drinkers but by the numbers of people sleeping rough in the grounds of the church".
As mooted in the pages of this paper, the danger is if Westminster acts, others follow, as one London council official told this paper: "Westminster tends to be a trendsetter." Similarly, those who traditionally offer support to homeless people – often churches – find themselves under pressure to conform. The gulf between the attitude of The Parish Church of St Marylebone and that of Hinde Street Methodist Church, a quarter of a mile away, is a good example of this.
Hinde Street, the base of West London Mission, which works closely with the church, has resisted attempts to move on the rough sleepers, who have some drinkers among their number, who sleep around the church. Paul Thompson, Director of Social Work at West London Mission, told The Pavement: "The police are now making active moves to clear our steps, and move people on, which is something we are not happy with, as we are keen to stand alongside homeless people and work positively with them." Thompson pointed out that although they are not a haven for street drinkers, and do not wish to encourage such behaviour, the ministers of the church, such as Father Leao Neto, see part of their job as providing a sanctuary. We received no response from Marylebone Church, despite many emails and telephone calls.
Are you under orders to move from a regular sleeping spot? Let us know at The Pavement so that move-ons such as Surrey Street (the Strand) and Marylebone don't go unreported.
October – November 2024 : Change
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01