Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
Please help us to help more homeless people by setting up a monthly direct debit.
the Pavement relies on donations and volunteering from individuals and companies...
MORE ON DONATING
RECENT TWEETS
Gatekeeping protest
May 24 2009
The London Coalition Against Poverty writes about its important campaign to halt the abuse
Dear Editor,
Despite the ministerial rebuke on the subject three years ago, there seems to have been no let up in the use of 'gatekeeping' techniques by local authority Homeless Persons' Units (HPUs,) whereby they try to reduce the number of homeless applications accepted. Pressure from central Government initiatives to 'prevent homelessness' and reduce the number of people in temporary accommodation have encouraged the local authorities to find ways to avoid acknowledging the homelessness of people who approach them and to provide them with interim accommodation while making enquiries. This is done by means such as giving verbal discouragements rather than properly investigated written decisions, demanding excessive amounts of supporting paperwork, advice to await eviction through the courts rather than leave when given notice by a landlord and pressure to accept inappropriate alternative accommodation. Much of this is designed to elongate the process in the hope that people will become frustrated and give up on their application or find an alternative solution in the meantime. In doing so they fail to fulfil their already limited legislated duties to help homeless people, for the sake of meeting centrally set targets and protecting inadequate housing stock.
For some time now, the London Coalition Against Poverty (LCAP) has been opposing gatekeeping practices in the London Borough of Hackney by means such as distributing information on the duties of local authorities outside the HPU and carrying out direct action casework to support those being denied their legal rights in demanding them.
However, Hackney are by no means the only offender; therefore LCAP is proposing to put on a Gatekeeping Roadshow to tour our efforts to raise awareness of these practices around 10 other London boroughs over a five-week period, starting on the 25th May. The Roadshow will be highlighting the widespread nature of these practices, distributing information about the duties of HPUs, gathering feedback about the experiences of those presenting themselves as homeless and, where appropriate, offering LCAP's support to those being fobbed of by the local authority.
Although LCAP is co-ordinating the campaign, in many cases it is groups from the communities local to the areas we are visiting that are taking part. We intend to present our findings to the Department of Housing at the end of the Roadshow. Should any of your readers be interested in becoming involved in this campaign, we can be contacted at: gatekeepingroadshow@googlemail.com and would welcome people either to come along on the days of the Roadshow, to call on local authorities to end these practices, or groups who want to take on regular work in their local area, as we have been doing in Hackney. Further information and all our materials can be downloaded from the www.lcap.org.uk website by following the Gatekeeping Roadshow link. It is our contention that the countrywide reduction in accepted homeless applications in recent years does not represent the effectiveness of homelessness prevention so much as the effectiveness of gatekeeping, and the false picture that this gives will continue to hamper calls for a necessary increase in secure social housing if left unchallenged.
Yours Sincerely,
The London Coalition Against Poverty, by email
By the time you're reading this, it'll have been going a few days, but, with five weeks planned, there's still plenty of time. Get involved. Even if you don't think you've been affected by gatekeeping, help others and prevent it in future by helping this campaign.
Editor
Despite the ministerial rebuke on the subject three years ago, there seems to have been no let up in the use of 'gatekeeping' techniques by local authority Homeless Persons' Units (HPUs,) whereby they try to reduce the number of homeless applications accepted. Pressure from central Government initiatives to 'prevent homelessness' and reduce the number of people in temporary accommodation have encouraged the local authorities to find ways to avoid acknowledging the homelessness of people who approach them and to provide them with interim accommodation while making enquiries. This is done by means such as giving verbal discouragements rather than properly investigated written decisions, demanding excessive amounts of supporting paperwork, advice to await eviction through the courts rather than leave when given notice by a landlord and pressure to accept inappropriate alternative accommodation. Much of this is designed to elongate the process in the hope that people will become frustrated and give up on their application or find an alternative solution in the meantime. In doing so they fail to fulfil their already limited legislated duties to help homeless people, for the sake of meeting centrally set targets and protecting inadequate housing stock.
For some time now, the London Coalition Against Poverty (LCAP) has been opposing gatekeeping practices in the London Borough of Hackney by means such as distributing information on the duties of local authorities outside the HPU and carrying out direct action casework to support those being denied their legal rights in demanding them.
However, Hackney are by no means the only offender; therefore LCAP is proposing to put on a Gatekeeping Roadshow to tour our efforts to raise awareness of these practices around 10 other London boroughs over a five-week period, starting on the 25th May. The Roadshow will be highlighting the widespread nature of these practices, distributing information about the duties of HPUs, gathering feedback about the experiences of those presenting themselves as homeless and, where appropriate, offering LCAP's support to those being fobbed of by the local authority.
Although LCAP is co-ordinating the campaign, in many cases it is groups from the communities local to the areas we are visiting that are taking part. We intend to present our findings to the Department of Housing at the end of the Roadshow. Should any of your readers be interested in becoming involved in this campaign, we can be contacted at: gatekeepingroadshow@googlemail.com and would welcome people either to come along on the days of the Roadshow, to call on local authorities to end these practices, or groups who want to take on regular work in their local area, as we have been doing in Hackney. Further information and all our materials can be downloaded from the www.lcap.org.uk website by following the Gatekeeping Roadshow link. It is our contention that the countrywide reduction in accepted homeless applications in recent years does not represent the effectiveness of homelessness prevention so much as the effectiveness of gatekeeping, and the false picture that this gives will continue to hamper calls for a necessary increase in secure social housing if left unchallenged.
Yours Sincerely,
The London Coalition Against Poverty, by email
By the time you're reading this, it'll have been going a few days, but, with five weeks planned, there's still plenty of time. Get involved. Even if you don't think you've been affected by gatekeeping, help others and prevent it in future by helping this campaign.
Editor
October – November 2024 : Change
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01