Established 2005 Registered Charity No. 1110656
Scottish Charity Register No. SC043760
DONATE
Please help us to help more homeless people by setting up a monthly direct debit.
the Pavement relies on donations and volunteering from individuals and companies...
MORE ON DONATING
RECENT TWEETS
If you‘re on benefits, this could affect you - forewarned is forearmed
Thousands of people could lose some or all of their benefit under changes being introduced in late 2009 and early 2010 in the way benefits are paid. This is part of a crackdown on work-shy claimants that the Government is calling "the biggest shake-up of the benefits system for 60 years". You can already have your money cut (or "sanctioned") for a number of reasons, but the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) is gearing up for sanctions on a grander scale than ever contemplated by any Government.
The danger is that many thousands of wholly honest, innocent and jobseeking claimants may find they and their families are left with no money, perhaps for weeks at a time. If your benefit is cut, you have a right of appeal. Wherever possible, you should get help or advice with a tribunal, but people can win them by themselves.
What types of sanction are there?
You can have your benefit cut for failing to look for work, for missing meetings or checks at the job centre, or for failing to follow steps that an adviser recommends. Sanctions follow for convictions for certain offences such as benefit fraud. Benefits may also be cut off where you fail to supply information you are asked for or expected to supply. This happens when the DWP or local authority lose the information you send them.
What will be covered in the new sanctions?
Soon, a policy of workfare will be introduced whereby claimants will be compelled to work simply to receive benefit. Sanctions may also be imposed where you have been fined for certain offences, or have suffered a penalty, including offences for which you may be cautioned. These include alleged criminal acts committed towards benefit staff and could potentially include things as minor as little as making a noise in the benefit office. The sanction may be imposed in response to a caution, so you may not even be convicted of an offence.
What about drug testing?
Included in the Welfare Reform Bill are regulation-making powers to be used where a claimant is suspected of abusing drugs or alcohol. Ultimately, the Government wants to test claimants who are suspected of drug or alcohol abuse, and sanctions could be imposed where you refuse to be tested. Just how qualified job centre staff or hirelings will be to conduct such assessments remains to be seen.
What benefits are at risk?
Sanctions will be mainly aimed at unemployed claimants receiving Job Seeker's Allowance (JSA) or Employment and Support Allowance. (Income support is being abolished.) Under the Bill, "sanctionable benefit" can include housing and council tax benefit.
Which benefits may not be sanctioned?
Certain benefits are likely to be excluded. These may include joint-claim JSA; retirement pensions, disability living allowance, attendance allowance, child benefit and guardian benefit. Certain payments from the Social Fund and Christmas bonuses will be excluded. Sanctions may be imposed for any period from one week up to 26 weeks. Different rules will apply for couples with joint JSA claims.
What about pensioners?
Pensioners may be treated more lightly, as the Secretary of State has a wide discretion. Perhaps with a view to media reaction and calls of 'Scrooge', the Christmas bonus is omitted from the list of sanctionable benefits.
Are there risks?
Yes. A DWP officer may make a mistake, get your name confused with someone else's, misunderstand the facts, or lose your documents and details. You could simply fall victim to a careless or even a plain nasty individual who shouldn't be in the job and takes it out on you, the claimant. A sanction could be imposed out of incompetence, prejudice or spite. There may even be targets of how many people each centre is meant to reach, and cuts in DWP staff are likely. Sanctions may be imposed upon someone who is already subject to deductions - for example, for a Social Fund loan.
How many people will be affected?
Impossible to say, but it is likely to be thousands. Tom McNulty, DWP minister, told Parliament last year that his Department had sanctioned 280,000 claimants up to July 2008. When this happens, the person sanctioned disappears off the unemployment register, giving an impression in statistics that unemployment is falling. Who makes the decision to sanction? The initial decisions are made officials at the DWP, usually based on information from the adviser who works on the claimant's case.
What if you get a sanction?
The first thing to establish is why you are being sanctioned. The DWP should issue a letter explaining the reasons for their decision.
What should I do if I am wrongly sanctioned?
You must appeal in writing against the decision. Put a letter into the DWP office stating that you wish to appeal. Keep a copy and telephone them afterwards to check they have received it. In practice, DWP rules require that any letter that mentions an appeal should be treated as such.
How long do I have to appeal?
You must appeal within one month of the DWP letter.
What happens when I appeal?
Sometimes the DWP will reverse their decision on receiving your appeal letter. If they reject your appeal, then the matter will be sent to the Tribunal Service, which arranges hearings.
What happens next?
The Tribunal Service will write to you asking if you want to go ahead. You should reply in writing and the Tribunal Service will list a date and place for the Tribunal to be heard near you.
What will the DWP do if the case goes to Tribunal?
The DWP sends a bundle of documents to you via the Tribunal Service. Don't be put off by its size. The bundle will give details only of law that is favourable to the DWP. It will not include cases or points that are favourable to you, nor any facts in your favour. It is important that you tell the Tribunal the facts and your point of view.
What is the Tribunal?
Social Security Appeal Tribunals are now known as the 'Lower Tier Tribunal'. Tribunals used to have three members but they are now, increasingly, heard by a legally-qualified judge, who sits alone.
What arguments can be used?
There are lots of potential arguments; and, in most case, there will be an issue which the DWP has overlooked, known as "failing to consider a relevant fact". In a number of cases, sanctions should not be imposed where there is what is called "good cause" for the claimant doing what s/he did - in other words, there are reasons or mitigating circumstances. For example, if you are sanctioned for being late at an interview or not turning up, you may have good cause for not having done what you were told or what was expected of you. In one recent case, a person sanctioned for missing an interview was actually undertaking a DWP-approved study course at the time. The DWP may simply lose the information you have sent and cut off benefit. "Good cause" is not defined in law, so there may be all kinds of good reasons why you should not be sanctioned which the DWP decision maker did not know about.
What happens at the Tribunal?
Appeals are heard before a single judge and can be dealt with quite quickly. The DWP often do not turn up for the hearing. Tribunals concentrate on finding the facts. They tend to be informal, being held sitting round a table at the Tribunal office, and are thus different to courts. However, they are serious proceedings, and the Judges have wide powers to correct DWP errors.
Can a friend come with me?
Yes, a friend or relative can come along to advise or represent you as what is called a "McKenzie friend". S/he can help you take notes and present your case, and give you confidence and support.
What evidence should the Tribunal look at?
The judge will look at your appeal letter and the documents from the DWP and then ask questions. Anyone who knows about your circumstances can give evidence. A lot of evidence is given by simply answering the questions from the Judge. However, the Tribunal should look at any other evidence you bring along.
What sort of evidence can be considered?
A wide range of evidence can be considered. You can bring witnesses who can confirm what you say or talk to the judge direct. If you are on medication, bring a doctor's letter, hospital letters and examples of all your medicines to show the tribunal. Potentially any document, film or photo can be used as evidence.
What happens at the end of the hearing?
Sometimes you will be given the judge's decision immediately. Sometimes it will be later and a copy is always given in writing. If your appeal succeeds, the sanction will be cancelled and any money restored.
Are there further rights of appeal?
Yes, on points of law beyond the Tribunal, and cases eventually can reach the Courts. If you are appealing, get legal advice or guidance from any advice or support agency wherever possible. Useful books on all aspects of social security law are issued by the Child Poverty Action Group. The Government ought to be worried about the impact not just on claimants but also on how DWP centres will cope if they get lots of appeals. One DWP employee recently said that his office would struggle with more than six appeals in a month. In fact, it seemed to collapse with just one!
The danger is that many thousands of wholly honest, innocent and jobseeking claimants may find they and their families are left with no money, perhaps for weeks at a time. If your benefit is cut, you have a right of appeal. Wherever possible, you should get help or advice with a tribunal, but people can win them by themselves.
What types of sanction are there?
You can have your benefit cut for failing to look for work, for missing meetings or checks at the job centre, or for failing to follow steps that an adviser recommends. Sanctions follow for convictions for certain offences such as benefit fraud. Benefits may also be cut off where you fail to supply information you are asked for or expected to supply. This happens when the DWP or local authority lose the information you send them.
What will be covered in the new sanctions?
Soon, a policy of workfare will be introduced whereby claimants will be compelled to work simply to receive benefit. Sanctions may also be imposed where you have been fined for certain offences, or have suffered a penalty, including offences for which you may be cautioned. These include alleged criminal acts committed towards benefit staff and could potentially include things as minor as little as making a noise in the benefit office. The sanction may be imposed in response to a caution, so you may not even be convicted of an offence.
What about drug testing?
Included in the Welfare Reform Bill are regulation-making powers to be used where a claimant is suspected of abusing drugs or alcohol. Ultimately, the Government wants to test claimants who are suspected of drug or alcohol abuse, and sanctions could be imposed where you refuse to be tested. Just how qualified job centre staff or hirelings will be to conduct such assessments remains to be seen.
What benefits are at risk?
Sanctions will be mainly aimed at unemployed claimants receiving Job Seeker's Allowance (JSA) or Employment and Support Allowance. (Income support is being abolished.) Under the Bill, "sanctionable benefit" can include housing and council tax benefit.
Which benefits may not be sanctioned?
Certain benefits are likely to be excluded. These may include joint-claim JSA; retirement pensions, disability living allowance, attendance allowance, child benefit and guardian benefit. Certain payments from the Social Fund and Christmas bonuses will be excluded. Sanctions may be imposed for any period from one week up to 26 weeks. Different rules will apply for couples with joint JSA claims.
What about pensioners?
Pensioners may be treated more lightly, as the Secretary of State has a wide discretion. Perhaps with a view to media reaction and calls of 'Scrooge', the Christmas bonus is omitted from the list of sanctionable benefits.
Are there risks?
Yes. A DWP officer may make a mistake, get your name confused with someone else's, misunderstand the facts, or lose your documents and details. You could simply fall victim to a careless or even a plain nasty individual who shouldn't be in the job and takes it out on you, the claimant. A sanction could be imposed out of incompetence, prejudice or spite. There may even be targets of how many people each centre is meant to reach, and cuts in DWP staff are likely. Sanctions may be imposed upon someone who is already subject to deductions - for example, for a Social Fund loan.
How many people will be affected?
Impossible to say, but it is likely to be thousands. Tom McNulty, DWP minister, told Parliament last year that his Department had sanctioned 280,000 claimants up to July 2008. When this happens, the person sanctioned disappears off the unemployment register, giving an impression in statistics that unemployment is falling. Who makes the decision to sanction? The initial decisions are made officials at the DWP, usually based on information from the adviser who works on the claimant's case.
What if you get a sanction?
The first thing to establish is why you are being sanctioned. The DWP should issue a letter explaining the reasons for their decision.
What should I do if I am wrongly sanctioned?
You must appeal in writing against the decision. Put a letter into the DWP office stating that you wish to appeal. Keep a copy and telephone them afterwards to check they have received it. In practice, DWP rules require that any letter that mentions an appeal should be treated as such.
How long do I have to appeal?
You must appeal within one month of the DWP letter.
What happens when I appeal?
Sometimes the DWP will reverse their decision on receiving your appeal letter. If they reject your appeal, then the matter will be sent to the Tribunal Service, which arranges hearings.
What happens next?
The Tribunal Service will write to you asking if you want to go ahead. You should reply in writing and the Tribunal Service will list a date and place for the Tribunal to be heard near you.
What will the DWP do if the case goes to Tribunal?
The DWP sends a bundle of documents to you via the Tribunal Service. Don't be put off by its size. The bundle will give details only of law that is favourable to the DWP. It will not include cases or points that are favourable to you, nor any facts in your favour. It is important that you tell the Tribunal the facts and your point of view.
What is the Tribunal?
Social Security Appeal Tribunals are now known as the 'Lower Tier Tribunal'. Tribunals used to have three members but they are now, increasingly, heard by a legally-qualified judge, who sits alone.
What arguments can be used?
There are lots of potential arguments; and, in most case, there will be an issue which the DWP has overlooked, known as "failing to consider a relevant fact". In a number of cases, sanctions should not be imposed where there is what is called "good cause" for the claimant doing what s/he did - in other words, there are reasons or mitigating circumstances. For example, if you are sanctioned for being late at an interview or not turning up, you may have good cause for not having done what you were told or what was expected of you. In one recent case, a person sanctioned for missing an interview was actually undertaking a DWP-approved study course at the time. The DWP may simply lose the information you have sent and cut off benefit. "Good cause" is not defined in law, so there may be all kinds of good reasons why you should not be sanctioned which the DWP decision maker did not know about.
What happens at the Tribunal?
Appeals are heard before a single judge and can be dealt with quite quickly. The DWP often do not turn up for the hearing. Tribunals concentrate on finding the facts. They tend to be informal, being held sitting round a table at the Tribunal office, and are thus different to courts. However, they are serious proceedings, and the Judges have wide powers to correct DWP errors.
Can a friend come with me?
Yes, a friend or relative can come along to advise or represent you as what is called a "McKenzie friend". S/he can help you take notes and present your case, and give you confidence and support.
What evidence should the Tribunal look at?
The judge will look at your appeal letter and the documents from the DWP and then ask questions. Anyone who knows about your circumstances can give evidence. A lot of evidence is given by simply answering the questions from the Judge. However, the Tribunal should look at any other evidence you bring along.
What sort of evidence can be considered?
A wide range of evidence can be considered. You can bring witnesses who can confirm what you say or talk to the judge direct. If you are on medication, bring a doctor's letter, hospital letters and examples of all your medicines to show the tribunal. Potentially any document, film or photo can be used as evidence.
What happens at the end of the hearing?
Sometimes you will be given the judge's decision immediately. Sometimes it will be later and a copy is always given in writing. If your appeal succeeds, the sanction will be cancelled and any money restored.
Are there further rights of appeal?
Yes, on points of law beyond the Tribunal, and cases eventually can reach the Courts. If you are appealing, get legal advice or guidance from any advice or support agency wherever possible. Useful books on all aspects of social security law are issued by the Child Poverty Action Group. The Government ought to be worried about the impact not just on claimants but also on how DWP centres will cope if they get lots of appeals. One DWP employee recently said that his office would struggle with more than six appeals in a month. In fact, it seemed to collapse with just one!
December 2024 – January 2025 : Solidarity
CONTENTS
BACK ISSUES
- Issue 153 : December 2024 – January 2025 : Solidarity
- Issue 152 : October – November 2024 : Change
- Issue 151 : August – September 2024 : Being Heard
- Issue 150 : June – July 2024 : Reflections
- Issue 149 : April – May 2024 : Compassion
- Issue 148 : February – March 2024 : The little things
- Issue 147 : December 2023 – January 2024 : Next steps
- Issue 146 : October 2023 – November 2023 : Kind acts
- Issue 145 : August 2023 – September 2023 : Mental health
- Issue 144 : June 2023 – July 2023 : Community
- Issue 143 : April 2023 - May 2023 : Hope springs
- Issue 142 : February 2023 - March 2023 : New Beginnings
- Issue 141 : December 2022 - January 2023 : Winter Homeless
- Issue 140 : October - November 2022 : Resolve
- Issue 139 : August - September 2022 : Creativity
- Issue 138 : June - July 2022 : Practical advice
- Issue 137 : April - May 2022 : Connection
- Issue 136 : February - March 2022 : RESPECT
- Issue 135 : Dec 2021 - Jan 2022 : OPPORTUNITY
- Issue 134 : September-October 2021 : Losses and gains
- Issue 133 : July-August 2021 : Know Your Rights
- Issue 132 : May-June 2021 : Access to Healthcare
- Issue 131 : Mar-Apr 2021 : SOLUTIONS
- Issue 130 : Jan-Feb 2021 : CHANGE
- Issue 129 : Nov-Dec 2020 : UNBELIEVABLE
- Issue 128 : Sep-Oct 2020 : COPING
- Issue 127 : Jul-Aug 2020 : HOPE
- Issue 126 : Health & Wellbeing in a Crisis
- Issue 125 : Mar-Apr 2020 : MOVING ON
- Issue 124 : Jan-Feb 2020 : STREET FOOD
- Issue 123 : Nov-Dec 2019 : HOSTELS
- Issue 122 : Sep 2019 : DEATH ON THE STREETS
- Issue 121 : July-Aug 2019 : INVISIBLE YOUTH
- Issue 120 : May-June 2019 : RECOVERY
- Issue 119 : Mar-Apr 2019 : WELLBEING
- Issue 118 : Jan-Feb 2019 : WORKING HOMELESS
- Issue 117 : Nov-Dec 2018 : HER STORY
- Issue 116 : Sept-Oct 2018 : TOILET TALK
- Issue 115 : July-Aug 2018 : HIDDEN HOMELESS
- Issue 114 : May-Jun 2018 : REBUILD YOUR LIFE
- Issue 113 : Mar–Apr 2018 : REMEMBRANCE
- Issue 112 : Jan-Feb 2018
- Issue 111 : Nov-Dec 2017
- Issue 110 : Sept-Oct 2017
- Issue 109 : July-Aug 2017
- Issue 108 : Apr-May 2017
- Issue 107 : Feb-Mar 2017
- Issue 106 : Dec 2016 - Jan 2017
- Issue 105 : Oct-Nov 2016
- Issue 104 : Aug-Sept 2016
- Issue 103 : May-June 2016
- Issue 102 : Mar-Apr 2016
- Issue 101 : Jan-Feb 2016
- Issue 100 : Nov-Dec 2015
- Issue 99 : Sept-Oct 2015
- Issue 98 : July-Aug 2015
- Issue 97 : May-Jun 2015
- Issue 96 : April 2015 [Mini Issue]
- Issue 95 : March 2015
- Issue 94 : February 2015
- Issue 93 : December 2014
- Issue 92 : November 2014
- Issue 91 : October 2014
- Issue 90 : September 2014
- Issue 89 : July 2014
- Issue 88 : June 2014
- Issue 87 : May 2014
- Issue 86 : April 2014
- Issue 85 : March 2014
- Issue 84 : February 2014
- Issue 83 : December 2013
- Issue 82 : November 2013
- Issue 81 : October 2013
- Issue 80 : September 2013
- Issue 79 : June 2013
- Issue 78 : 78
- Issue 77 : 77
- Issue 76 : 76
- Issue 75 : 75
- Issue 74 : 74
- Issue 73 : 73
- Issue 72 : 72
- Issue 71 : 71
- Issue 70 : 70
- Issue 69 : 69
- Issue 68 : 68
- Issue 67 : 67
- Issue 66 : 66
- Issue 65 : 65
- Issue 64 : 64
- Issue 63 : 63
- Issue 62 : 62
- Issue 61 : 61
- Issue 60 : 60
- Issue 59 : 59
- Issue 58 : 58
- Issue 57 : 57
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 56 : 56
- Issue 55 : 55
- Issue 54 : 54
- Issue 53 : 53
- Issue 52 : 52
- Issue 51 : 51
- Issue 50 : 50
- Issue 49 : 49
- Issue 48 : 48
- Issue 47 : 47
- Issue 46 : 46
- Issue 45 : 45
- Issue 44 : 44
- Issue 43 : 43
- Issue 42 : 42
- Issue 5 : 05
- Issue 4 : 04
- Issue 2 : 02
- Issue 1 : 01
- Issue 41 : 41
- Issue 40 : 40
- Issue 39 : 39
- Issue 38 : 38
- Issue 37 : 37
- Issue 36 : 36
- Issue 35 : 35
- Issue 34 : 34
- Issue 33 : 33
- Issue 10 : 10
- Issue 9 : 09
- Issue 6 : 06
- Issue 3 : 03
- Issue 32 : 32
- Issue 31 : 31
- Issue 30 : 30
- Issue 29 : 29
- Issue 11 : 11
- Issue 12 : 12
- Issue 13 : 13
- Issue 14 : 14
- Issue 15 : 15
- Issue 16 : 16
- Issue 17 : 17
- Issue 18 : 18
- Issue 19 : 19
- Issue 20 : 20
- Issue 21 : 21
- Issue 22 : 22
- Issue 23 : 23
- Issue 24 : 24
- Issue 25 : 25
- Issue 8 : 08
- Issue 7 : 07
- Issue 26 : 26
- Issue 27 : 27
- Issue 28 : 28
- Issue 1 : 01